Near-miss and incident reporting, investigation, and CAPA tracking for manufacturing plants.

Workers report in two minutes. The AI drafts the investigation in your format. Every action is tracked to closure, so fewer incidents come back.

Schedule a demo See the product

More reporting
Faster investigations
Fewer repeat incidents

Oil spill near tank T-105, saw it on morning rounds

Roughly how large is the spill?

About 2m × 1m, looks like it's coming from a flange

Has the area been secured?

Yes, cordoned it off and told the shift supervisor

Photo attached

Investigation · NM-0482

Classification · auto-suggested

Direct cause

Gasket failure at flange joint, transfer line

Root cause

Gasket service interval exceeded; PM schedule gap

Contributing factors · reasoning filled

DRAFT one app, one form · investigator reviews and owns

What's in the product

Six modules. One product. One action register.

Reports that arrive half-empty, classifications that drift, actions that age in a spreadsheet: each module closes one of those gaps.

Near-miss reporting

Workers report in a two-minute guided conversation. Reports come in complete, without forms.

Unsafe act & unsafe condition reporting

The same two-minute capture for the daily, highest-volume signals.

Incident reporting & investigation

Formal incident reporting (FIR), full analysis reports (FAR), and lessons from incidents (LFI), released plant-wide.

Safety observation rounds

Structured rounds run as coaching, not policing, with safe and unsafe trends by area.

CAPA & action tracking

One register for actions from every source. Owner, due date, evidence, or it escalates.

Dashboards & insights

Plant-wise rollups, repeat patterns, and program health for leadership.

One action register

Nothing leaves the register until it's closed with evidence, or it escalates.

Underneath all six: your own approval workflows, a notification at every handoff, an audit trail. The workflow engine →

Plus an HSE assistant that answers workers' safety questions in plain language. See it →

Outcomes

What changes at your plant, top to bottom.

Five results a safety program is judged on, each feeding the next. The AI drafts; your team decides what's final.

For workers
Near-miss reporting goes up.

Two minutes on a phone, not a form after shift. Events that went unreported start showing up.
For HSE managers
Classification stops drifting.

The AI suggests from your taxonomy, the same way every time, so trends compare like-for-like.
For investigators
Investigations keep pace.

Every event arrives with the analysis drafted. The ones that used to be skipped get done.
For HSE managers
Overdue actions stop hiding.

Owner, due date, evidence, or it escalates. Nothing sits forgotten in a spreadsheet.
For leadership
You see the repeat coming.

Patterns surface on their own, so the third similar event gets attention in time.

How it works

The AI does the groundwork. Your team owns the result.

01
It works from your plant's procedures, taxonomy, and formats.
02
It's grounded in publicly available incident investigations and guidance from bodies such as CSB, CCPS, OSHA, OISD.
03
It drafts the investigation for every event, near-misses and unsafe acts included: classification, factors, direct and root causes, with more than one proposed path.
04
Humans review, refine, and own everything. Nothing is auto-final.

Investigation copilot · NM-0482 · Oil spill, Tank T-105

Copilot thread

Could the gasket have passed inspection and still failed?

Possible. If the torque record is current, consider thermal cycling on the transfer line. Added as an alternative line under Hypothesis B.

based on 2 similar past events + public incident learnings

What are the most likely causes of heat exchanger tube ruptures?

Most documented cases trace to tube-side corrosion, vibration-induced fatigue, or overpressure during transient operation. Inspection intervals are the common gap.

sources: public investigation reports · industry guidance

Lines of analysis

Hypothesis A · gasket degradation investigator preferred

1 Oil on walkway
2 Flange leak, T-105 transfer line
3 Gasket condition at last service?

Hypothesis B · procedure deviation

Torque sequence in SOP not followed
Thermal cycling on transfer line

DRAFT review pending · J. Okafor, Team Lead

How the drafts stand up →

Proof

Running every day at a major fertilizer and petrochemical complex.

Raven Incident is live in production at Indorama Eleme in Nigeria, where more than 1,000 registered users report, investigate, and close events, on mobile and web, online and offline.

Deployed for one workflow. Expanded three times on customer pull.

1000+ reports processed
Every report tracked to closure
Live in days, not months

Android, iOS, and web. Our cloud or yours.

Android app
iOS app
Web app
Runs in our cloud or deployed in yours
SSO and role-based access
Live in days, not months

Security & data →

Start free. One price per plant.

From$9,000/yr per plant

Free 30-day pilot
No per-user fees
No per-module fees
No implementation fee

Pricing →

Ready to close the loop on safety?

See how Raven Incident captures complete reports, drafts investigations, and tracks every action to closure at your plant.

Schedule a demo